I've just come across this Guardian article by Theo Hobson (via Stephen Lingwood's Reignite blog) on his sojourn to a Unitarian church.
At the time of writing the article has 433 comments, which could reflect potential interest in Unitarianism - Christian-rooted or otherwise - but may also reflect the popularity of the journalist and/or the controversy he has caused by his portrayal of Christianity as having essentially violent undertones.
Although there are points I'm sure Unitarians would argue with, the article is in many ways a fair general reflection of present-day Unitarianism - 'a harmless radicalism'.
Looking down the comments, I also thought this brutally frank comment was insightful - and reflects in part my frustrations of the church I have often called home:
"I've attended a few Unitarian services, and the problem I have is not that they don't have a creed - i respect that, and the non-assertive nature of their congregation, all are welcome, no questions asked, plus the obvious liberalism. It's more that in their services they seem to borrow the religious element of other religions, almost as if they are playing at being religious, lacking any tradition of their own.
So one week we sang some Buddhist chants, and we all ommed away for a bit, and meditated (or closed our eyes anyway). Another week, we played at being Hindus. It felt very Western, trying on the clothes of various religions in turn, as if we could touch the numinous by proxy, while the sermons were essentially children's stories, Just So Stories."